Discussion about this post

User's avatar
R. C. Rybnikar's avatar

Another excellent piece with a lot to think about. There is so much to respond to but I'd like to take a crack at your suggestion that the divide on support for the Vietnam War might never be bridged. I tend to agree but add the somewhat bizarre reactions to those who did not go even when they later claimed to have supported the war (NY Gov Pataki said that his class at Yale supported the war from their commons rooms n New Haven.) George W went AWOL without political repercussions, Dan Quayle said that he joined the Indiana National Guard to support the War. (Several Guard units were sent overseas but that was likely not the hope of those who joined.) Many Boomers avoided the war while supporting every recent adventure. Dick Cheney famously had "other priorities" and still was named Sec of Defense. Anyone who said that they were against the war at the time, however, seem tarred with some brush. I keep hoping for an analogy with those who paid someone to take their place in the Union Army only to find themselves Imperialists in the 1890s there seemed as many of them who were not punished as there were 2-S veterans in GOP administrations going back to Reagan.

Expand full comment
Stephen Morgan's avatar

Such a great read. I moved from journalism to academia at the start of the 90s, and I sort of miss those moments when you mix with people so outside your world but seek to tell their story (like it or not). This is a very cool piece. Thanks.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts